|
|
Post by tz on Jan 8, 2006 9:46:40 GMT -5
Do we even have forty people on our roster? That's exactly what I was wondering. |
|
|
|
Post by The eXtremist on Jan 8, 2006 11:52:27 GMT -5
Do we even have forty people on our roster? That's exactly what I was wondering. Maybe the left-overs will be made up jobbers? Who knows what HC will come up with. |
|
|
|
Post by "Magnificent" Bryan Stinberg on Jan 8, 2006 11:58:59 GMT -5
I would actually like to participate in this Battle Royal if given the chance.
|
|
|
|
Post by The eXtremist on Jan 8, 2006 12:49:10 GMT -5
You probably can if your on the active roster.
|
|
|
|
Post by pohatu on Jan 8, 2006 13:16:57 GMT -5
Maybe they'll use the inactive roster as punching bags for the people from the active roster that participate in the 40 person battle royale....
|
|
|
|
Post by tz on Jan 8, 2006 13:23:41 GMT -5
Maybe they'll use the inactive roster as punching bags for the people from the active roster that participate in the 40 person battle royale.... That's a tad disrespectful, but maybe. |
|
|
|
Post by Seth Xavier on Jan 8, 2006 14:18:46 GMT -5
Maybe they'll use the inactive roster as punching bags for the people from the active roster that participate in the 40 person battle royale.... That's a tad disrespectful, but maybe. WWE does it. They always bring back people who were once big and throw them into the Royal Rumble and then just have them get eliminated right away. |
|
|
|
Post by pohatu on Jan 8, 2006 14:37:22 GMT -5
I did the math for it, at this point. If Eric does that, it'll only be 39 people, not forty.
|
|
|
|
Post by tz on Jan 8, 2006 14:39:00 GMT -5
That's a tad disrespectful, but maybe. WWE does it. They always bring back people who were once big and throw them into the Royal Rumble and then just have them get eliminated right away. Exactly, the WWE does it.  |
|
|
|
Post by Justin Tyme-Can You Feel It?!? on Jan 10, 2006 21:20:38 GMT -5
That's a tad disrespectful, but maybe. WWE does it. They always bring back people who were once big and throw them into the Royal Rumble and then just have them get eliminated right away. but I was under the impression that Valor was original and didn't bounce off real fed ideas |
|
|
|
Post by shadow on Jan 17, 2006 1:39:05 GMT -5
I sign up to the Battle royal
|
|
|
|
Post by Tha CBT on Jan 19, 2006 14:48:50 GMT -5
Question. As I've never been in a Wrestlefest, Battle Royal..
Will this be royal rumble style? Where 2 start, and after a decided amount of time passes, another will enter?
Over-the-top battle royal style? Where all the wrestlers involved are in the ring, and last man left, wins?
Or gauntlet style? Where 2 start, and and after 1 is eliminated, by being thrown over the top rope, another random superstar will enter, and go untill 1 man is left?(Can be done, as "40" RP's are unlikely, and atleast 10, at most 20, will actually rp)
|
|
|
|
Post by Hardcastle on Jan 19, 2006 19:39:13 GMT -5
Question. As I've never been in a Wrestlefest, Battle Royal.. Will this be royal rumble style? Where 2 start, and after a decided amount of time passes, another will enter? Over-the-top battle royal style? Where all the wrestlers involved are in the ring, and last man left, wins? Or gauntlet style? Where 2 start, and and after 1 is eliminated, by being thrown over the top rope, another random superstar will enter, and go untill 1 man is left? (Can be done, as "40" RP's are unlikely, and atleast 10, at most 20, will actually rp)Royal Rumble style. |
|
